Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '18 at 15:01
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 109
55% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 378
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 21.1
19% 20.7 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G5SA754D117-511 240GB
108GB free
Firmware: N0530A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 503
Write 366
Mixed 432
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 33.6
108% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 69.6
71% 116 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 106%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
128GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 458
Mixed 481
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 38.2
135% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 67.2
70% 115 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,269
Write 924
Mixed 1,012
237% 1,068 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 36.2
166% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 68.2
74% 125 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 164%
Great: 236%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
2TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 145
Mixed 140
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.18
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
412GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 99
Write 93.5
Mixed 90.7
71% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.39
105% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D169DS3.16FP 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $642
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback