Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '18 at 13:07
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 112
49% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 9.09
6% 8.43 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 8.52
6% 7.59 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 100
Write 118
Mixed 105
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.35
118% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
174GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 86.2
Write 84.8
Mixed 81.8
63% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
Lexar CF USB_3_0 Read 8GB
7GB free, PID b049
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 111
Write 40.5
Mixed 68.7
83% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.66
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 1.24
131% 4.15 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD03EU1324M 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 13
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback