Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 22:35
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 561
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2802 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 189
Parallax 191
146% 186 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 175
Splatting 120
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
94GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 413
Mixed 416
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 40.2
151% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 41.4
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 91.7
79% 111 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 500
Write 340
Mixed 345
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 17.1
100% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 9.09
22% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
563GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 130
Mixed 129
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
419GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 135
Write 163
Mixed 146
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.28
71% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
229GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 96.6
Write 121
Mixed 108
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 107%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
63GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 88.2
Write 80.8
Mixed 72.6
60% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.55
125% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 Builds (Compare 777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback