Asus P5Q DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5Q DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090521
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 19 '14 at 17:56
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 121
43% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 125
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1571) 1.2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4411
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 38
Parallax 28
20% 30.3 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 26.7
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
167GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 78.5
Write 68.3
Mixed 31.3
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.23
66% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 48.9
Write 66.6
Mixed 24.1
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.24
84% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MK8046GSX 80GB
16GB free
Firmware: LB313M Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 43.7
Write 41.1
Mixed 29.6
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.15
38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 27%
USB 2.0 SD MMC Reader 4GB
3GB free, PID 8123
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 17
Write 10.6
Mixed 12.1
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.75
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 1.24
110% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Typical P5Q DELUXE Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback