ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire 5100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Acer Aspire 5100 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Navarro
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '18 at 14:19
Run Duration	477 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 19 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 34 2-Core 65.9 37% 54.8 Pts	4-Core 65.5 8-Core 66.6 9% 66.1 Pts	64-Core 67.2 4% 67.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon Xpress Acer(1025 009F) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.35 0% 0.26 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB-$76 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: SB2OC70P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 12884901888 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 5996 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 12616 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 5858 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 959 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 72 72 288283 (C2) HDA temperature 125 125 274878824492 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 82 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	21.5% Poor	Read 38.6 Write 36 Mixed 5.25 19% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.2 60% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 25%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 3,571 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 13GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	6.19% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 10.6 Mixed 9.72 15% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.22 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 16% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.19% Great: 38%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 0245 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	4.48% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 4.04 Mixed 5.47 9% 9.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.32 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.003 13% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.48% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback