Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '16 at 02:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 85.8
1-Core 49.3
2-Core 98.9
51% 78 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 175
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E155) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.771.0.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 6.03
6% 6.91 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 7.26
5% 6.31 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GBSJ 128GB
36GB free
Firmware: CJPA0203 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 192
Write 172
Mixed 150
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 14.4
60% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 11.8
19% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 49%
OCZ VERTEX-LE 60GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
Read 161
Write 47.5
Mixed 82.6
21% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.63
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 6.65
47% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 22.8
31% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SRT2G88U1-H9M SRT2G88U1-H9M 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.8
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback