MSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7971
MotherboardMSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '18 at 17:13
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 235
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 467
63% 468 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
Asus(1043 04F3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.5% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 50.5
Parallax 56.8
40% 52.3 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 45.2
Splatting 35.9
35% 43.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 507
Write 325
Mixed 339
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 21.5
126% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 19.6
25% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 105
Mixed 107
79% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.43
101% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 146
Mixed 151
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3500620AS 1TB
924GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.8% Good
Read 111
Write 115
Mixed 119
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.52
128% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
886GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 104
Mixed 95.6
73% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.31
90% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971) Builds (Compare 3,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971) - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback