Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD4H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '18 at 14:45
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 569
59% 473 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361D) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 35.7
25% 31.2 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 32.1
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 400
Mixed 410
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 25.8
112% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 110
134% 238 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 175
Mixed 166
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
192GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 127
Write 113
Mixed 134
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.17
64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
296GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 178
Mixed 141
118% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.33
101% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CMZ4GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback