Dell Inspiron 24-3455

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Inspiron 24-3455  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03PYWR
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 00:59
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 62.3
34% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 83.1
8-Core 98.2
12% 90.6 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Dell(1028 06D1) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 3.47
2% 3.79 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R2C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 91.6
Mixed 94.6
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 24-3455 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 24-3455

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback