Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '18 at 03:26
Run Duration431 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 239
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 888
79% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,259
78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 148
Parallax 128
116% 139 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 136
Splatting 110
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90
232GB free
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 495
Write 347
Mixed 329
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 20.5
99% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 45.7
71% 137 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 100%
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
215GB free
Firmware: 5.81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 514
Write 286
Mixed 324
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 22.3
123% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 89.9
105% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 93%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,349
Write 1,431
Mixed 1,573
394% 1,784 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 47.2
165% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 99
106% 180 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 242%
Great: 210%
WD Blue 250GB-$90
113GB free
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 495
Write 347
Mixed 324
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 20.4
100% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 45.9
70% 136 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
842GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 130
Write 108
Mixed 103
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.18
80% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
682GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 74.3
Write 80
Mixed 72.7
57% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.22
89% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 67%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00AZ6B0 3TB
3TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 75.8
126% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.17
61% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 45%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
3TB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 84.2
130% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.28
92% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00AZ6B0 3TB
2TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 90.1
Write 86.6
Mixed 69.3
104% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.93 MB/s
WDC WD30 EZRX-00AZ6B0 3TB
427GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.7% Below average
Read 93.6
Write 93.2
Mixed 70.9
109% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.14
58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 45%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
385GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 65.3
Write 65
Mixed 68.1
86% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.25
50% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
375GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 98.1
Write 96.4
Mixed 98.5
126% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.23
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 51%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
107GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
40% Average
Read 68.9
Write 110
Mixed 78.3
116% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.21
75% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40%
Great: 48%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
2GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 70
Write 76.7
Mixed 63.8
91% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.27
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $525
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback