Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160310
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '18 at 22:40
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka) 11,026 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 168 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 269 36% 269 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2377 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.7% Very good	Lighting 84.6 Reflection 98.1 Parallax 79.7 69% 87.5 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 85 Splatting 101 80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 375GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 1,476 Write 1,303 Mixed 1,363 308% 1,380 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 61 218% 78.7 MB/s	DQ Read 46.1 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 31.9 49% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1531 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 634 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 55 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 53 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8941554142
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 140GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 291 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 122 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 33 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1558601480	91.9% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 395 Mixed 413 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 31.6 143% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 39.3 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 21.7 41% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 836GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 153059736 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2042 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11478220 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1686 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 689 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032842 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 61 454295579 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7684 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 25769803803 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -22900765621824 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3498268835 (F2) Unknown 100 253 71507264611	106% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 172 Mixed 170 135% 180 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.21 87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.2% Average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 18.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16