Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory117.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 20:05
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 144
53% 92 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 646
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 1,546
96% 1,546 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 114
Parallax 95.1
87% 105 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 98
Splatting 96.6
80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 912GB
843GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 827
Write 880
Mixed 819
188% 842 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 9.16
53% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 60.3
50% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 146%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 720GB
572GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 872
Write 815
Mixed 803
185% 830 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 17.3
65% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 9.45
37% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 176%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,555
Write 1,789
Mixed 1,554
366% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 14.6
86% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 46.3
55% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 202%
Great: 353%
Seagate ST6000VN0001-1SF17Z 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: AN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 155
Mixed 142
121% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.26
119% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 119%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
5GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 4.46
Mixed 6.64
11% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.58
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.95
61% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1866C8-8GTX F3-2400C10-8GTX F3-2400C10-8GTX F3-2400C10-8GTX F3-2133C9-8GTX F3-2400C10-8GTX F3-2400C10-8GTX F3-2400C10-8GTX F3-2133C9-8GTX Undefin... 128GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 57.7
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 51.8
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.3
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 124%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback