HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1670
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110728
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 17:41
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 138
60% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 184
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 1670) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.882.2.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.46 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 393
Write 219
Mixed 204
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 17.9
77% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 41.9
67% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
23GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 48.8
Mixed 30.5
32% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.31
74% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback