Lenovo 5397F7G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 5397F7G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 5397F7G
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '18 at 14:00
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 L 620
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 76
41% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 127
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.41 fps
MRender 0.57
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 0.74
0% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 231
Write 215
Mixed 229
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 13.7
47% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 49.5
51% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 80AD HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback