HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 339A
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '18 at 21:17
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 190 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 374 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26% Poor	Lighting 31.3 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 40.6 26% 34.5 fps	MRender 31.4 Gravity 31 Splatting 35.8 27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 100 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 337 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 19 (AE) Unknown 100 100 287 (B4) Unknown 0 0 21 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 54 197568495652 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2168410907 (F7) Unknown 100 100 36584421 (F8) Unknown 100 100 31560945
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 264GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2269 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3916 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1342 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3022 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1300 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1157 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 184 (C2) HDA temperature 112 96 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	69.6% Good	Read 118 Write 124 Mixed 113 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.5 123% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 14GB free Firmware: MS1OA7J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 131 131 12896436399 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2396 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2323 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1375 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2403 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2403 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 184684707870 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.1% Average	Read 87.7 Write 83.4 Mixed 98.1 68% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.17 61% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 103%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 15GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 96.2 Write 28.2 Mixed 35.5 55% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.24 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.03 45% 2.59 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BA160B.M16F 859B CT51264BA160B.M16F 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.2% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	908x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	285x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	204x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	418x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	129x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	86x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16