Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '18 at 00:25
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 172
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 325
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.44
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 358
Write 239
Mixed 270
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 8.74
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 4.96
25% 8.24 MB/s
DQ Read 2.64
DQ Write 1.78
DQ Mixed 1.63
1% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CH9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback