Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '16 at 02:23
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 736
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 58
Parallax 51.1
48% 55.9 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 58
Splatting 51.7
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G3SA754D117-485 240GB
170GB free
Firmware: N0530A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 305
Mixed 381
88% 398 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 35.9
150% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 69.7
111% 212 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97%
Great: 97%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 472
Mixed 495
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 45.7
180% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 164
175% 291 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 173
Mixed 164
131% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.97
4K Mixed 0.27
125% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
871GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 108
Write 119
Mixed 108
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.29
94% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 109%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
149GB free
Firmware: HH100-10 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 53.3
Write 40.7
Mixed 40
34% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.36
82% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27%
Great: 36%
WD Elements 1TB
795GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 88.4
125% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.23
74% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
Memorex Capless 16GB
14GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 22
Write 5.16
Mixed 5.07
10% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.47
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.002
28% 2.49 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 1,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 7 - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $823
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback