Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 262
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 687
74% 590 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
338GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 477
Write 414
Mixed 443
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 14.6
117% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 15.2
30% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 101%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
200GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 475
Write 417
Mixed 445
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 14.4
117% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 49.9
43% 61 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81%
Great: 101%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 503
Write 424
Mixed 470
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 18.8
125% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 19.1
28% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 29.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 47.4
84% 47.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback