ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 80VR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Lenovo 80VR (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Provence-75I
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '18 at 15:04
Run Duration	93 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 209 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 581 60% 485 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$60 1,772 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,689 Write 661 Mixed 902 238% 1,084 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 44.2 170% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 113 118% 195 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 213%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40 57,200 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 360GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 193 185 1333 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10808 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 724 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 917 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13151 (C2) HDA temperature 107 87 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 681	48.9% Average	Read 70.4 Write 100 Mixed 84.8 64% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.23 66% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 371 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.4% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 22.3 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 21.6 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 80VR Builds (Compare 1,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Lenovo 80VR

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,275x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	212x
Bench 68%, 26,417 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	785x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	698x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	235x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	76x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	73x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	325x
RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 6,014 samples	149x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	107x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback