ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus K401UB

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus K401UB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K401UB
Memory	10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151015
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '16 at 15:53
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 168 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 239 32% 239 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1CDD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Lighting 6.57 Reflection 9.92 Parallax 6.28 5% 7.59 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 5.83 Splatting 13.5 7% 8.42 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SMSM151S324GD 24GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM01B9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 186 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 182 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 33 (AA) Unknown 100 100 21 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 6619167 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 58 180389937192 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 574355 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 389284 (F2) Unknown 100 100 253455 (F3) Unknown 100 100 110382343808100 (F4) Unknown 100 100 31 (F5) Unknown 100 100 101 (F6) Unknown 100 100 102255	19.2% Very poor	Read 274 Write 30.6 Mixed 67.2 26% 124 MB/s	4K Read 5.22 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 1.9 19% 7.67 MB/s	DQ Read 7.48 DQ Write 41.8 DQ Mixed 2.37 8% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 54%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 346GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 149 1216 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14317 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2066 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 258 (BF) G-sense error rate 98 98 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 38 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27508 (C2) HDA temperature 112 80 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	57.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 96.1 Mixed 99 75% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.21 67% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5591, Sandisk Ultra Flair Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 117 Write 37.2 Mixed 51.4 73% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 1.02 112% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G9E1 Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical K401UB Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K401UB

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	29x
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	11x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	29x
GTX 940MNvidiaBench 9%, 15,731 samples	11x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $40Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6CFR6A-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GBHynixBench 53%, 3,550 samples	7x
8KTF51264HDZ-1G9E1 1x4GBMicronBench 31%, 191 samples	5x
8KTF51264HDZ-1G9E1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 53%, 423 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback