ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq 6735s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6735s (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30E4
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '18 at 16:59
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD TurionX2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-86 30 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 35.5 2-Core 69.9 36% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 70.8 8-Core 70.7 9% 70.8 Pts	64-Core 68.9 4% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 30E4) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$47 2,386 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: LV011C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1559 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1183 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1152 (0A) Spinup retry count 123 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1177 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 49 555221025 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 82 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 655370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3990 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044249633 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8349 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 892 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 258 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	28.5% Poor	Read 49 Write 50.1 Mixed 45.7 36% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.22 54% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 7.5 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Compaq 6735s Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP Compaq 6735s

CPU
TurionX2 Dual Core Mobile RM-72AMDBench 33%, 26 samples	2x
TurionX2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-82AMDBench 35%, 30 samples	1x
Sempron SI-42AMDBench 27%, 500 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	6x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback