MSI MS-1719x

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 13 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GX701
MotherboardMSI MS-1719x  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080812
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5750-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 38.4
34% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 25.3
8-Core 21.2
3% 23.2 Pts
64-Core 40
2% 40 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 38%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$47
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 23 35 37 38 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 8.8
Write 17.9
Mixed 15
SusWrite 29.2
13% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 31%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 2GB
0GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 21
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.4
9% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-1719x Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1719x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback