Samsung RV415/RV515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSamsung RV415/RV515  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV415/RV415
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '18 at 15:58
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 51.7
1-Core 20
2-Core 35.4
26% 35.7 Pts
4-Core 36.4
8-Core 39
5% 37.7 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sanyo(144D C589) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HN-M500MBB 500GB-$80
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 54.2
Mixed 64.3
45% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.27
68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata HY73I1B1672ZMT 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 12%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV415/RV515 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV415/RV515

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback