Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '18 at 20:17
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 170
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 680
60% 508 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 73.2
62% 75 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 71.1
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 462
Write 328
Mixed 337
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 11.1
67% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 11.3
28% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
630GB free
Firmware: CC57 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 191
Mixed 181
143% 191 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.21
97% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 33.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 20.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback