Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '18 at 20:15
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 128
53% 88 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 691
56% 492 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 51.3
48% 55.5 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 51.5
46% 56.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 462
Write 329
Mixed 334
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 11.3
68% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 62.7
DQ Mixed 11.4
28% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
630GB free
Firmware: CC57 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 192
Mixed 176
144% 192 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.26
106% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 32.5
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback