Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Extreme  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '18 at 16:04
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B40
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 88.4
48% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 178
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
MSI(1462 2980) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 49.5
Parallax 73.2
45% 59.4 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 47.7
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 512
Write 194
Mixed 284
72% 330 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 6.4
85% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 7.68
64% 152 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 72%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
124GB free
Firmware: FH10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 58.6
Write 64.1
Mixed 69.1
48% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.25
72% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
32GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 157
Mixed 136
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.24
82% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 112%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
177GB free, PID 2771
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 144
Mixed 80.3
145% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 3.15
4K Mixed 0.44
124% 1.41 MB/s
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 8.78
Mixed 11.1
16% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.31
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.02
25% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL9 Series 1866 CL9 Series 1866 CL9 Series 1866 CL9 Series 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Extreme Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback