Asus N750JV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N750JV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N750JV
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140411
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '18 at 15:58
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 498
48% 395 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 129D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 7.66
3% 7.02 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.09
5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 486
Write 153
Mixed 232
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 12.9
87% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 26.9
39% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
125GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 73.4
Write 74.7
Mixed 93.5
61% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.23
70% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N750JV Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback