MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7786
MotherboardMSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateJan 19 '18 at 20:13
Run Duration1372 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 48.7
34% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 65.9
8-Core 68.9
9% 67.4 Pts
64-Core 73
4% 73 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Gigabyte(1458 21D8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.69
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 79.7
Write 80.7
Mixed 76.8
60% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.24
48% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 54%
31GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Read 0.91
Write 0.74
Mixed 0.82
1% 0.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.38
30% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD34G133381 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-P33 (MS-7786) Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786) - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback