Asus GL702VSK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VSK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VSK
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 19:50
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 551
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.6
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 117
Parallax 84.8
78% 99.4 fps
MRender 93.2
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 102
80% 96.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
381GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 502
Write 478
Mixed 502
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 14.1
72% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 91.4
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 49.1
48% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 97%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 487
Write 458
Mixed 476
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 19.1
108% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 48.9
79% 151 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 91%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
855GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 109
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.21
87% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 04CB AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VSK Builds (Compare 589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702VSK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback