ECS H67H2-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardECS H67H2-EM  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110304
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 07:35
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$188
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 186
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 470
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
AMD(1002 2543) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 11
Parallax 12.9
12% 13 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 12.8
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 337
Write 45.9
Mixed 77.3
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 9.19
59% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 27.4
49% 101 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
981GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 93.7
Mixed 91.3
72% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.21
82% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
524GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 149
Write 133
Mixed 131
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.34
95% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 114%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
358GB free
Firmware: MKAOA390 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 118
Write 96.5
Mixed 107
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.23
56% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B2873FHS-CH9 M378B2873FHS-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-EM Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H67H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback