HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83A5
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 04:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 734
78% 624 Pts
64-Core 720
44% 720 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
HP(103C 83A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.25
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 144
Parallax 131
103% 134 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 124
Splatting 106
92% 113 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
931GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 412
Mixed 413
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 44.7
150% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 111
116% 191 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
466GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,280
Write 1,874
Mixed 1,743
437% 1,966 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 69.3
242% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 197
203% 332 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 298%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,263
Write 1,833
Mixed 1,660
426% 1,919 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 68.2
238% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 183
190% 312 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 293%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4S2800316G18-B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 29.3
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: HP OMEN X by HP Laptop 17-ap0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback