Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 01:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 145
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 414
41% 336 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Gigabyte(1458 2558) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 5.72
6% 6.49 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 5.57
5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
STT_FTA480MM25 480GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0803B5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
Read 340
Write 300
Mixed 264
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 23.7
112% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 35.7
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 22.5
28% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
770GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 14.3
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.18
81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3 Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback