Performance Results

Gaming 46%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 55%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:05
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$647
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 67
1-Core 130
2-Core 250
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 969
86% 729 Pts
64-Core 2,216
137% 2,216 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 49%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHFD03N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 212 168 167 169 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 335
Write 321
Mixed 314
SusWrite 191
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 40.4
136% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 179
149% 215 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 335
Write 326
Mixed 317
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 241
182% 245 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
1GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1033
Write 1820
Mixed 1,303
313% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 58.1
209% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 941
706% 946 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
1GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,962
Write 1,674
Mixed 1,541
384% 1,726 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 60.8
213% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 876
651% 865 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 33
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 9.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 50 60 27" 1280 720 DELA198 DELL S2721QS
Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 105%
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 133%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback