Performance Results

Gaming 124%
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 121%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 14:20
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 278
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 817
84% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 177
Parallax 168
152% 177 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
286GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 1320 1663 1603 1609 1596 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,431
Write 1,813
Mixed 1,695
SusWrite 1,445
413% 1,846 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 79.9
270% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 914
692% 936 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 312%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,474
Write 2,367
Mixed 1,692
485% 2,178 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 86.3
288% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,070
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 878
662% 894 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
773GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 183 192 194 187 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 186
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2
361% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C18-8GTZRX F4-3600C18-8GTZRX F4-3600C18-8GTZR F4-3600C18-8GTZR 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 38.3
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 36.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 34" 1280 720 IVM7624 PL3467WQ
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 129%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback