Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 04:26
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 269
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 730
75% 604 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 123
Parallax 122
97% 121 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 107
Splatting 93.2
79% 97.1 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
220GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 515
Write 416
Mixed 423
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 25.3
88% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 45.6
49% 82 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 124%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 445
Write 307
Mixed 249
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 9.47
4K Write 9.27
4K Mixed 7.13
28% 8.62 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 13.7
DQ Mixed 8.87
11% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 185
Mixed 174
138% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.25
96% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
587GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 155
Mixed 152
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.19
47% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 29.2
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 28.1
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 52.6
76% 52.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $702
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback