Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 17:33
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 638
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 127
Parallax 114
98% 120 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 108
Splatting 96.6
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
220GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 513
Write 415
Mixed 423
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 29.7
114% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 52
56% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 124%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
42% Average
Read 452
Write 241
Mixed 226
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 9.48
4K Mixed 5.84
28% 8.49 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 6.8
9% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
3TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 179
Mixed 179
139% 184 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.23
87% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
443GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 131
Mixed 162
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.23
75% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 20.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $702
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback