HP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA)

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 845A
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '24 at 07:36
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45% Average
Memory 19.5
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 185
49% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 545
58% 461 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 45%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 845A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.9
4% 6.1 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN740 NVMe WD 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73914107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1157 1332 1308 1293 431 308 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 1108
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 972
252% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 40.1
136% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 393
304% 415 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 177%
Great: 354%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 6 60 23.8" 1920 1017 DELA0B2 DELL U2414H
Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA) Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 74%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback