Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime10 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 10:39
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 210
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 597
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1214) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 7.9
6% 7.43 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.8
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 64.8
52% 67 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 64
Splatting 65.2
54% 65.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
862GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,445
Write 1,126
Mixed 1,140
275% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 59.2
190% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 628
494% 690 MB/s
Poor: 185% Great: 373%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
647GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 86.2
Mixed 23.1
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9S8ME-8 859B CT8G4SFD8213.C16FDD2 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.7% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 19.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 22.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 144 15.5" 1920 1009 LGD0533
Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop 78%
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback