Asrock X670E Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 325%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 381%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics275% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock X670E Steel Legend  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Steel Legend
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 22:02
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$329
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 203
2-Core 406
124% 235 Pts
4-Core 801
8-Core 1603
142% 1,202 Pts
64-Core 2,864
177% 2,864 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$958
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
275% Outstanding
Lighting 410
Reflection 392
Parallax 448
334% 417 fps
MRender 507
Gravity 341
Splatting 247
285% 365 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 275%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,616
Write 1841
Mixed 1,643
381% 1700 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 70.3
243% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,588
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 481
540% 939 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
279GB free
Firmware: CS900KB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 466 470 472 471 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 245
Write 106
Mixed 121
SusWrite 469
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 29.3
98% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 81.7
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 168
113% 135 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 96%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
490GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4555 2616 2278 1948 2196 1852 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 2,720
Write 4,567
Mixed 3,313
SusWrite 2,574
747% 3,294 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 110
370% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 2,215
DQ Write 1744
DQ Mixed 2,008
1,495% 1,989 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 469%
Great: 614%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
223GB free
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 119 153 145 159 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 460
Write 343
Mixed 328
SusWrite 182
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 19.8
76% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 44.3
50% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 55%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 487 489 480 475 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 478
Mixed 457
SusWrite 483
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.6
203% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
124GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,115
Write 3,412
Mixed 2,258
584% 2595 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 77.7
272% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 2,359
DQ Write 2,039
DQ Mixed 2,158
1,629% 2,185 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
218% Outstanding
MC Read 107
MC Write 60.8
MC Mixed 72.6
229% 80.1 GB/s
SC Read 65.3
SC Write 62.6
SC Mixed 62.6
182% 63.5 GB/s
Latency 39.7
101% 39.7 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 218%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 57% 7 185 13 240 31.5" 2560 1440 GSM780F LG ULTRAGEAR+
History: Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B | Score 60: 0P 5R 7G 14B | Score 60: 0P 5R 10G 5B
Typical X670E Steel Legend Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,075
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback