Asrock B660M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B660M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 11:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 171
2-Core 331
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 972
98% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73% Very good
Lighting 91.3
Reflection 90.6
Parallax 83.8
74% 88.6 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 81
Splatting 72.3
70% 88 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 191 204 120 166 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
63GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 108 102 109 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 111
Write 119
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 110
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GIS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 65: 0P 5R 10G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
65% 36% 69 218 58 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical B660M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B660M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback