Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 11:28
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 220
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 421
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 22.5
14% 22.4 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 25.2
19% 22.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast 240GB A800 240GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 290
Mixed 220
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 21.9
110% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 115
115% 181 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 89%
Biostar S100-120GB 120GB
52GB free
Firmware: R0724S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 129 127 129 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 433
Write 129
Mixed 128
SusWrite 128
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 12.7
65% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 24.2
41% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HCS5C3232SLA380 320GB
74GB free
Firmware: ST2OA37E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45% Average
Read 75.9
Write 77.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 80.8
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 25.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 75 23.8" 1280 720 LEN67A2 D24-40
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback