HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AE
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220329
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '24 at 18:27
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 138
54% 93 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 302
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 87AE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5244
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.1% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 51.7
45% 55.3 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 45.9
42% 51.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 143 56 74 58 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 1,035
Write 722
Mixed 692
SusWrite 109
142% 640 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 38.7
134% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 334
256% 345 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 105%
Great: 203%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
137GB free
Firmware: VE1R9105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 364 361 348 322 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 325
Write 322
Mixed 285
SusWrite 349
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 21.1
71% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 196
150% 198 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 27 60 16" 1280 720 BOE08F6
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback