MSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 300%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 336%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E06
MotherboardMSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06)  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '24 at 20:36
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14600KF-$294
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 214
2-Core 446
127% 248 Pts
4-Core 897
8-Core 1,601
150% 1,249 Pts
64-Core 2,637
163% 2,637 Pts
Poor: 119%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
MSI(1462 5133) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 360
Reflection 348
Parallax 413
293% 374 fps
MRender 488
Gravity 304
Splatting 219
262% 337 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 247%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
510GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1205 1333 1327 1333 1376 1429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 2,762
Write 2,509
Mixed 1952
SusWrite 1,334
479% 2,139 MB/s
4K Read 75.1
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 111
376% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 2,075
DQ Write 1,434
DQ Mixed 1,541
1,208% 1,683 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 386%
Great: 410%
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1933 2574 2575 2577 2539 2541 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 1,899
Write 2,590
Mixed 2,150
SusWrite 2,456
516% 2,274 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 271
4K Mixed 95.6
356% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 2,180
DQ Write 1465
DQ Mixed 1,746
1,324% 1,797 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 416%
Great: 417%
Fanxiang S880 1TB
798GB free
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3046 3687 3577 1495 1308 1123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 4,129
Write 4,295
Mixed 3169
SusWrite 2,373
784% 3,491 MB/s
4K Read 77.9
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 114
399% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 2,222
DQ Write 1403
DQ Mixed 1,647
1,272% 1,757 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 514%
Great: 543%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
MC Read 79
MC Write 75.6
MC Mixed 70.6
214% 75.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 52.8
SC Mixed 31.4
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 5R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 22% 23 527 421 165 27" 2048 1081 HKC2736 27E6QC
History: Score 25: 0P 5R 0G 0B | Score 31: 0P 5R 2G 0B | Score 41: 0P 5R 5G 1B
Typical Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06) Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 240%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z790 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E06)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback