Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 19:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G-$199
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 187
2-Core 356
108% 207 Pts
4-Core 718
8-Core 1,040
110% 879 Pts
64-Core 1,293
80% 1,293 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 106%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.40.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 65.9
36% 43.3 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 72.2
45% 51.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 900 1TB
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFM11A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4122 1253 740 740 742 743 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2675
Write 4339
Mixed 3,210
SusWrite 1,390
657% 2,903 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 82.8
267% 90.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,659
DQ Write 1,083
DQ Mixed 1,491
1,080% 1,411 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 336%
Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 62.1
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 52.5
163% 57 GB/s
SC Read 50.5
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 49.7
146% 51.2 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 156%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 60 27" 1920 1017 SAM7079 LC27G5xT
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $869
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback