Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration	320 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 86 2-Core 142 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 456 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 61.1 53% 65.2 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 71.4 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7397 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 61 (B1) Unknown 98 98 26 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 54 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 50 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29603878284	71.4% Very good	Read 495 Write 198 Mixed 231 67% 308 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 16.1 108% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 17.1 58% 129 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 133 133 25787957539 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 142 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 28132 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 131 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3129 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3129 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 206159872032 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	99.6% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 171 Mixed 163 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.19 102% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 108%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 334GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 70.3 Write 77.4 Mixed 52.3 85% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.35 57% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 304GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 99.5 Write 116 Mixed 98.6 137% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.19 56% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 62%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 268GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	32% Below average	Read 79.5 Write 78.2 Mixed 62.3 93% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.31 48% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 82GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 88.3 Write 60.4 Mixed 49.9 78% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.25 60% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 43%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 77GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	43% Average	Read 73.8 Write 120 Mixed 95.3 132% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.34 80% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 54%
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B2 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 59.1 Write 50.4 Mixed 48.9 66% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.13 53% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 40%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 12GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 73.1 Write 77 Mixed 76.6 98% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.16 48% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0118 16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.4% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 16.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	418x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	352x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	220x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	216x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $334

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16