Lenovo 20TA002FUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20TA002FUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20TA002FUS
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 14:22
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KNA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 165
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 263
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 5088) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 11.2
9% 11.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.77 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 937
Write 135
Mixed 218
92% 430 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 23.5
119% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 162
129% 183 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 177%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 500GB
405GB free
Firmware: 3202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 37
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 8.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 22 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Typical 20TA002FUS Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 15%
Desktop 76%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20TA002FUS

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback