HP Laptop 15-bs1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bs1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832A
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 05:15
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4417U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 55.9
29% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 170
18% 143 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
HP(103C 832A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 48 53 60 56 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 35.9
Write 71.3
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 55
15% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 13.7
32% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO10EC
Typical Laptop 15-bs1xx Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bs1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback