HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8427
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 19:38
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 173
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 362
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 8429) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 20.3
19% 23.6 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 22
Splatting 23
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 818 784 762 783 786 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 870
Write 876
Mixed 773
SusWrite 806
187% 831 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 22
82% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 373
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 126%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 26.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 19.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 4 60 15.5" 1536 841 AUO33EB
Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback