Microelectronics G356

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G356  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 18:17
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 246
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 636
68% 542 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Asus(1043 871D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 111
Parallax 128
101% 121 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 107
Splatting 99.3
100% 126 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 1.2 51 13 14 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 70.4
Write 72.5
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 18.9
10% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 7
68% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 61.5
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 8.1
14% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 209%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
240GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 28.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 27.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 5 240 27" 1280 720 HPN3967 OMEN 27qs
Typical G356 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Microelectronics G356

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback