TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Microelectronics G356

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G356  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4S/ac
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 22:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 287
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,028
96% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Asus(1043 871D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 180
Parallax 134
111% 150 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 119
Splatting 108
110% 139 fps
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 72 75 58 54 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,297
Write 926
Mixed 875
SusWrite 107
178% 801 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 73
258% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 218
263% 443 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑
This bench: 163%
 Great: 209%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
105GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 164 170 169 167 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 169
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 165
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 94.5%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 30.7
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 48.3
SC Mixed 31.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 114%
 Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B72
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical G356 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Microelectronics G356

CPU
Core i7-9700KFIntel  $250Bench 97%, 32,736 samples59x
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples1x
GPU
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples32x
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPERNvidiaBench 98%, 395 samples19x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples2x
SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel  $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples38x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD  $77Bench 277%, 114,373 samples5x
Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD  $89Bench 437%, 23,469 samples3x
RAM
NMUD480E82-3600 2x8GBUnknownBench 99%, 196 samples27x
CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 45,582 samples4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 89%, 87,344 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback